Poor result weighed down by lower print and digital advertising at News Corp Australia, a division that includes flagship newspaper The Australian

It’s the new NFTs and Crypto re: dropping buzzwords to make stock line go up.

Those things aren’t exactly alike.

Crypto currency had the potential to dethrone the Visa/Mastercard duopoly and give us a real digital currency, but the whole idea got sidetracking by pyramid schemes and slow and expensive implementations that made it unusable for actually buying stuff online. They will however almost certainly make a come back, either by more modern implementations without the cost and energy waste or more likely in the form of a government backed digital currency (e.g. Digital Euro), that wouldn’t need this extreme zero-trust P2P stuff and thus workaround the major problem with current crypto.

NFTs were even worse when it comes to hype and scams. They are neat tech, basically a digital crypto version of a ticket roll. Problem is, you have to actually have something that that ticket gives you entrance too. None of the NFT hype had that, they sold you tickets for nothing, even the idea of NFTs being images was a lie, as the images were accessible to the public, the NFTs wasn’t used to actually verify ownership of the image. That said, I could see them making a comeback, they provide a solution for a digital market place that isn’t tied to any single company, i.e. they could allow you to access all your EPIC Store games through Steam, allow used sales of digital games and a bunch of other stuff. Not much has happened in that direction so far, and I wouldn’t expect any digital shop to give up their control over your purchases without some lawsuit.

AI is a completely different beast. It’s not a solution in search for a problem. Quite the opposite, it’s a solution to all the problems that have remained unsolvable by traditional means. It’s also not a new thing. The hype is somewhat new thanks to ChatGPT. But this stuff has been constantly improving over the last decade, and starting to match or surpass human level performance in more and more domains with no end in sight. There is no doubt that AI will fundamentally change the world, it’s this generations steam engine or transistor. Furthermore AI isn’t one thing by one company, it’s just math. A collection of algorithms that you can throw at any problem. It didn’t start with OpenAI and it won’t end there. This is not some hype that will blow over. This will only get better and start creeping into every corner of our lives. It will of course still be used for some grift, but that shouldn’t detract from the very real changes it will bring in the long run.

I don’t think the MBA-types care about the differences though. They just want to say new words that sound impressive to shareholders

@FoxBJK@midwest.social
link
fedilink
English
81Y

Except AI can actually be used for things and provides real value to people right now.

@acastcandream@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
1Y

ChatGPT helps me break writers block.

Bitcoin created years of jacked up prices for GPUs and is helping to boil the planet/burn through rare earth metals. All while generating wealth for primarily hedgefunds by completing arbitrarily set difficulties for math problems that require grinding the GPU for literally no meaningful output lol

The thing that is so pernicious about cryptocurrency is that the more computational power you throw at it, the less efficient it actually becomes. That means more adoption you have, the worse it is.

Yewb
link
fedilink
11Y

Modern crypto currency doesn’t have the same energy problems, if we can’t all agree on a common non government controlled currency howv will we ever break the generational control?

Whats your solution?

Bitcoin is still PoW.

Crypto is not generally used as currency. It’s treated like stocks and as a tool for tax evasion.

@renard_roux@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
31Y

A thought — instead of doing worthless math, couldn’t it be something useful like protein folding? Remember Folding@Home? Or cancer research or something?

I mean I know it’s probably too late, proof of stake bring replaced by that other thing (or was it the other way around?), and maybe the useless math was something that had to do with calculating the blockchain or whatever; I just don’t understand why someone couldn’t have come up with a way to make it have actual value.

Or maybe they did and I just don’t know about it, honestly couldn’t be bothered to jump on the bandwagon.

There have been attempts at making useful things with the calculations, but none of them have really taken off.  It’s a speculator’s market through and through.

@renard_roux@beehaw.org
link
fedilink
English
11Y

Shame the speculators can’t vote for something more useful with their money 😓 You’d think they’d have a moral interest in balancing the scales a bit, what with the money laundering pyramid scheme and all 😅 /s

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 56 users / day
  • 167 users / week
  • 618 users / month
  • 2.31K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.28K Posts
  • 67K Comments
  • Modlog