How is this funny? 8 Upvotes at current writing???

Lupec
link
fedilink
57M

My best guess is it’s a play at the usual “all you do in python is import libraries without knowing how they work lololol” dig but yeah, I don’t find it particularly funny either

It’s kind of funny because it looks like it is nonsense dreamt up by a non-programmer. But it actually works.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
267M

It’s literally this comic, five years and a research team later.

More like all the research teams.

And 10 years

Dandroid
link
fedilink
57M

It’s funny how solvable that problem is now. I remember seeing that comic, I think over a decade ago now, and thinking about how true it was. It really shows you have far we’ve come in CS.

From the hovertext: “I wrote 20 short programs in Python yesterday. It was wonderful. Perl, I’m leaving you.

After years of a dozen other languages, I finally tried Perl the other day.

Never again, if I can help it.

Time travel is a prerequisite but don’t worry, you can just

from __future__ import antigravity

Future libraries still makes me laugh.

mac
link
fedilink
167M

“I also sampled everything in the medicine cabinet”

This made me smile.

mac
link
fedilink
1477M

I thought it was poking fun at the tutorial saying instead of learning to code, import a library from someone who knows how to code.

That’s what libraries are for. I’m no security expert and the sensible thing to do is using a library instead of taking a class.

@bort@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
25
edit-2
7M

I’m no security expert and the sensible thing to do is using a library instead of taking a class.

Counterpoint: “not knowing your libraries” + “blind trust in the maintainer” will give you stuff like this: https://bitbucket.org/snakeyaml/snakeyaml/issues/561/cve-2022-1471-vulnerability-in

(the thread itself is worth a read. But also very impressive is the list of big players who fell for exactly this mentality)

Jesus that was one hell of a thread

I dont want to see the words “low quality tooling” ever again.

Impressive and unsurprising. As soon as you start getting complex libraries with multiple dependencies it becomes nearly impossible to review everything. At one time I had an interest in contributing to some AI libraries, but they’re a mess as soon as you go looking for points of improvement.

Love the part where he claims that if your users are authenticated, it’s not untrusted input. I mean, surely you trust all of your users to run any code on your server, right?

Works as well.

billwashere
link
fedilink
English
77M

Which is funny because when I first started my CS degree in the late 80s (get off my lawn) we used to make fun of the beginning Java classes because it seems 90% of coding was to import the right library.

That is a large part of coding

billwashere
link
fedilink
English
17M

Good because I was confused. I’ve written similar code

Otter
link
fedilink
English
307M
from Lemmy import Upvote
from Fediverse import Posts
from ActivityPub import Submit

target_post = 'https://lemmy.ca/post/18691085'
num_votes = 8

post = Posts.open(target_post)

package = Upvote(post, num_votes)

package.Submit(target_post)

or something

Because this example isn’t really programming, it’s just calling an existing library. Which is the big joke about Python.

OK that way I get why it could be considered funny.

Adel Khial
link
fedilink
327M

It’s funny because

from apps import facebook-killer as fb

fb.start()

// 3 million seed investment 

SyntaxError

: Inconstistent indentation

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 77 users / day
  • 211 users / week
  • 413 users / month
  • 2.92K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.53K Posts
  • 33.8K Comments
  • Modlog