Twitter shows police brutality, anti-vaccine videos on TikTok copycat
www.nbcnews.com
external-link
Users said they saw violent content when they swiped up on videos after the feature was highlighted by Elon Musk on Sunday.
marx2k
link
fedilink
171Y

I don’t get how I never see that on regular Twitter.

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
61Y

You’ve never seen any posts containing meat?

marx2k
link
fedilink
251Y

You know, I really wish you were clearer in your OP so I wasn’t dragged in to a vegans discussion

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
61Y

Oh no you had to think about what happens to the animals you eat for a few seconds!

reric88🧩
link
fedilink
81Y

Eating animals isn’t the problem, necessarily. It’s how the animals are grown and raised like crops is the problem. I have a weird stance on this that looks very contradicting. Humans are animals, and we are engineered to include meat in our diets. However, I don’t agree with how the majority of us access that meat.

I’m a strong believer in hunting for food, not sport. If you’re going to eat an animal, you should work for it. And be thankful. Doesn’t matter what beliefs you hold, you owe thanks to what the animal has provided you.

Meat farms are disgusting. But there’s no way they will ever go away. They’re much too profitable for companies to give up.

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
6
edit-2
1Y

How do you humanely kill an animal who doesn’t need or want to die?

How does thanking someone after you needlessly kill them help anything?

Why not just eat plants when we can easily thrive on a plant based diet?
We aren’t “engineered” at all, we’re omnivores which means we can do just fine both with and without meat.

reric88🧩
link
fedilink
41Y

You hunt it. Not as a sport. Give the animal a fair chance, and even then it’s not a fair fight, so be thankful for what’s been provided

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
4
edit-2
1Y

Killing when we don’t have to is cruel, doing it in the forest doesn’t make it better, we can just eat plants.

There’s nothing fair about needless killing, nothing is provided to you, you’re taking it be force.

reric88🧩
link
fedilink
7
edit-2
1Y

We are animals engineered to eat meat. It is natural for humans to do so. Killing an animal has nothing to do with morality. How and why it’s done does

marx2k
link
fedilink
111Y

I didn’t say I eat animals, chief.

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
21Y

Oh no you had to think about what happens to the animals you other people eat for a few seconds!

It’s a too bad that you weren’t more clear than your first post, people almost took you serious

The “people going “yum” in the comments” made it so extremely obvious its about OP not wanting to see pieces of cooked meat in beef ramen videos

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
4
edit-2
1Y

Why wouldn’t it be serious?

Meat is cut up animal corpses.
Humans can easily thrive without meat so it’s clearly abusive to kill for profit/taste.

Could you reactionary fucks think about the subject for more than 2 seconds before you get angry and downvote?

reric88🧩
link
fedilink
121Y

Come on, guy, are you farming for an argument? You aren’t helping your case by being abrasive

Dio
link
fedilink
11Y

No, they’re incapable and whingy.

Melpomene
link
fedilink
111Y

With respect, this approach does nothing to convince people to reduce their meat consumption, and in fact alienates people who might otherwise be on the fence about reducing their meat intake.

pjhenry1216
link
fedilink
31Y

This is kind of funny, cause it’s the same approach the toxic right takes against progressives. “Be nice to us cause pointing out the things you do makes us get angry instead and won’t convince us.” It’d be ridiculously hilarious if it weren’t so sad at the same time. This is the most subtly toxic response you could have had.

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
5
edit-2
1Y

We get told this literally no matter how we approach the subject lol.
Which approach is it you think I’m using here and why is it ineffective?
It’s not like I’ve been especially rude or anything?

Which approach worked on you?

Melpomene
link
fedilink
111Y

You’ve been hostile (“reactionary fucks”) and you’ve hijacked the broader discussion referenced in the article (Musk’s Twitter showing terrible videos including human death, animal cruelty, etc) to make a point about meat consumption generally versus videos on Twitter showing the intentional and purposeful infliction of pain on animals for pleasure.

My meat consumption is down quite a bit. Information on substitutes, good recipes, studies on the intelligence of (for example) squid and such have shifted me into eating less meat. While I’m sure you’d prefer people not eat meat at all, convincing 5 people to cut their meat consumption 50% is better than convincing 0 people to cut their meat consumption 100% , no?

NotAPenguin
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
1Y

(“reactionary fucks”)

After my comments were downvoted to hell lol.

I’ve not hijacked anything, I contributed to the conversation and everyone lost their minds because they don’t wanna think about the animal abuse they support every day.

convincing 5 people to cut their meat consumption 50% is better than convincing 0 people to cut their meat consumption 100% , no?

Would you feel the same about abolishing slavery?

Melpomene
link
fedilink
41Y

Would I prefer that 5 people free half of their slaves versus no one freeing any slaves? Of course, why would I want everyone to stay enslaved if I could free some and continue to work to free others? Would you prefer that everyone who is currently a slave remain enslaved until we convince the entire world to free their slaves?

I think they more prefer to focus on the issue (the state of Twitter) in a post about Twitter, versus going off on tangents that would otherwise make for interesting conversation.

???

Slavery never ended suddenly, exactly like any other major change in society. Also its extremely off topic.

pjhenry1216
link
fedilink
31Y

The “reactionary fucks” was in response to hostility. Hijacking broader topic? I’m sure you’re on reddit complaining about John Oliver taking over the broader topic that is generally on r/pics. I’ll let you ruminate on that until you see the obvious point.

I’m sure in history some abolitionists wanted to get rid of slavery all together, but just minimizing the number of slaves is better than nothing right so they shouldn’t have been so absolutist. At least according to your own argument unless you admit to being hypocritical or simply not understanding the argument of those you’re responding to. You can’t be neither though.

You’re putting forth either bad faith arguments or extremely toxic ones, under the guise of polite society. It’s kind of sickening if you aren’t actually intentionally doing it.

EatALime
link
fedilink
11Y

Do people post much food content on Twitter? I never really used Twitter other than when news stories included tweets so I have no idea what’s popular out there.

@SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
link
fedilink
2
edit-2
1Y

A lot of people actually do post a lot of food. At least within the art community on Twitter there are so many food posts on the timelines of artists. Saying this as I only use Twitter for specifically them.

marx2k
link
fedilink
51Y

Its become mostly far-right wing spam.

Think if 4chan trolls and stormfront trolls had a bastard child.

Melpomene
link
fedilink
11Y

This is not the mental image I wanted before I finished my coffee this morning.

Bri Guy
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
1Y

The content moderation is more active I guess. People post stuff like that all the time on Facebook and Instagram too. Not sure if they have an algorithm or whatever to trigger removal but a good amount are still manually removed by workers, some who quit because of the psychological repercussions

https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/25/18229714/cognizant-facebook-content-moderator-interviews-trauma-working-conditions-arizona

marx2k
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
1Y

Yeah, I did listen to a podcast about content moderators at Facebook having breakdowns from dealing with having to see that kind of shit day in, day out.

Fuck. That. Noise.

Create a post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

  • 1 user online
  • 63 users / day
  • 173 users / week
  • 621 users / month
  • 2.31K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 3.28K Posts
  • 67K Comments
  • Modlog