You just have to be able to navigate whatever executable file format it is, figure out where the data/code sections are, how different parts are linked together, and translate all the binary opcodes to readable mnemonics.
True. Machine code usually has a 1:1 mapping to assembly so it’s not hard to read machine code as assembly. Although you will not see any of the labels (unless for some reason the the labels were left in).
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
your code is fucking gay
👉 👈
Given my code (mind)fucks only those who try to read it, you’re gay
New gender dropped, source baby source!
All files are binary.
There are ternary computers - just not so popular. Maybe when Carbon nanotube computers will take off it will be a thing.
Quantum computers enter the picture
Damn woke physics
Bitgot
No, all files are base 256
That’s just binary with extra steps.
Remember, there is no ‘bad’ code – we have to be tolerant. There is just ‘different’ code.
*glances at PR*
Man why does your code look so… *Different? *
ASCII art
This feels on topic:
https://github.com/dawsbot/woman
Nah
Now all we need to do is rewrite this in Rust (the enby solution) and call it… idk… “enbym”?
Dark mode would be NB-PM
If it ain’t C, it’s crap
C for crap.
R for rubish.
Fair enough.
Also: https://github.com/TodePond/DreamBerd
Everything is open source of you can read assembly.
binaries aren’t assembly though, they’re *peers at notes, draws a blank* they’re… something else
You just have to be able to navigate whatever executable file format it is, figure out where the data/code sections are, how different parts are linked together, and translate all the binary opcodes to readable mnemonics.
Easy. 😁
I think it’s most commonly called machine code.
True. Machine code usually has a 1:1 mapping to assembly so it’s not hard to read machine code as assembly. Although you will not see any of the labels (unless for some reason the the labels were left in).
They’re assembled into binary (together with metadata in some cases).
Nah, everything is binary. We just view it through false lenses because the switches got too tiny and people got too dumb.