Stupid idea that’s clearly motivated by the city’s deference to their tech gentry. Self driving anything has too many questions and issues still. I’m also not inclined to table “well what about the problems with people driving?” That only tells me we need transit, not robo taxis.
Yeah, because there’s zero investment in transit. We literally don’t have the resources to make a bunch of EV cars so we’re gonna have to invest in transit one way or another.
I promise I’m not trying to make fun of you but this sounds a bit like a suburban person’s perception of the city rather than what the city is actually like. None of this is more common on a subway than anywhere else.
San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months. The incidents include running through yellow emergency tape, blocking firehouse driveways and refusing to move for first responders.
I’d be curious to see how that compared to the number of idiot human drivers who got in the way and otherwise reacted incorrectly to emergency vehicles.
Big difference is that a human can be yelled at and told what to do, and we currently don’t have a good way for someone to do that with an autonomous vehicle.
Well, you can just ram them out of the way with your firetruck. Obviously that’s not a great option either, but if the FD does that then any damages are on the robot-taxi company.
Sure, I suppose. Or just don’t expand the system until there’s some measure of system in place to keep the AI cars from fucking around in emergency situations.
As far as I’m aware, all autonomous vehicles have manual controls that can override them. The person inside the vehicle would have to take over when an emergency responder started yelling directions.
🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
On Thursday, the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, voted 3-1 to let self-driving car companies expand their programs and start charging passengers like taxis.
San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months.
“Our folks cannot be paying attention to an autonomous vehicle when we’ve got ladders to throw,” San Francisco Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson said in a public meeting on Monday providing commissioners testimony before Thursday’s vote.
“We have demonstrated our deep willingness and longtime commitment to work in partnership with California state, SF city and first responders,” said Waymo spokesperson Katherine Barna.
In one of those episodes, captured on police body camera footage obtained by Mission Local, a driverless car approached the scene of a massive fire in a residential neighborhood and inched slowly toward the firehose as frustrated first responders did all they could to stop it.
Several police officer and firefighter associations and unions in the Bay Area wrote letters to the CPUC urging the regulator to hold off on allowing the expansion of driverless car programs in San Francisco, according to Mission Local.
Just have them be overridden with a key like Elevators. Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.
Or alternatively, just take full liberty and bash the autonomous vehicle out of the way. No key required.
We already have the tech to let signal lights at intersections know emergency vehicles are approaching so they can direct traffic accordingly. No reason this couldn’t be adopted to autonomous vehicles.
OK, if the companies fielding the robot taxis pay for implementing those new systems entirely.
Since their products, which they profit from, make those systems necessary in the first place.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Stupid idea that’s clearly motivated by the city’s deference to their tech gentry. Self driving anything has too many questions and issues still. I’m also not inclined to table “well what about the problems with people driving?” That only tells me we need transit, not robo taxis.
Transit can only take you to a place along its route, and it takes forever to get there. Cars and taxis are popular for a reason.
Yeah, because there’s zero investment in transit. We literally don’t have the resources to make a bunch of EV cars so we’re gonna have to invest in transit one way or another.
Ding ding ding! We have a safe mode of robot transit: trains. See, we know exactly where they will go because they run on rails. Literally.
How am I supposed to sing “Oops I did it Again” at the top of my lungs on a train? I need a private booth for that.
Trains aren’t safe. They just expose you to different dangers, like airborne diseases, pickpocketing, and stabbing.
I promise I’m not trying to make fun of you but this sounds a bit like a suburban person’s perception of the city rather than what the city is actually like. None of this is more common on a subway than anywhere else.
I’d be curious to see how that compared to the number of idiot human drivers who got in the way and otherwise reacted incorrectly to emergency vehicles.
Don’t some autonomous vehicles have an emergency responder mode, too?
Big difference is that a human can be yelled at and told what to do, and we currently don’t have a good way for someone to do that with an autonomous vehicle.
Well, you can just ram them out of the way with your firetruck. Obviously that’s not a great option either, but if the FD does that then any damages are on the robot-taxi company.
Sure, I suppose. Or just don’t expand the system until there’s some measure of system in place to keep the AI cars from fucking around in emergency situations.
As far as I’m aware, all autonomous vehicles have manual controls that can override them. The person inside the vehicle would have to take over when an emergency responder started yelling directions.
Some of the vehicles don’t have anyone in them.
https://missionlocal.org/2023/05/waymo-cruise-fire-department-police-san-francisco/
One of the incidents in question.
🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
On Thursday, the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, voted 3-1 to let self-driving car companies expand their programs and start charging passengers like taxis.
San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months.
“Our folks cannot be paying attention to an autonomous vehicle when we’ve got ladders to throw,” San Francisco Fire Chief Jeanine Nicholson said in a public meeting on Monday providing commissioners testimony before Thursday’s vote.
“We have demonstrated our deep willingness and longtime commitment to work in partnership with California state, SF city and first responders,” said Waymo spokesperson Katherine Barna.
In one of those episodes, captured on police body camera footage obtained by Mission Local, a driverless car approached the scene of a massive fire in a residential neighborhood and inched slowly toward the firehose as frustrated first responders did all they could to stop it.
Several police officer and firefighter associations and unions in the Bay Area wrote letters to the CPUC urging the regulator to hold off on allowing the expansion of driverless car programs in San Francisco, according to Mission Local.
Just have them be overridden with a key like Elevators. Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.
Or alternatively, just take full liberty and bash the autonomous vehicle out of the way. No key required.
Hell yeah and then we can get a universal remote from the dank web and have free cars literally everywhere I’m down.
It doesn’t necessarily have to be a get-free-car feature. It could be limited to 20km/h or something if operated in control mode.
We already have the tech to let signal lights at intersections know emergency vehicles are approaching so they can direct traffic accordingly. No reason this couldn’t be adopted to autonomous vehicles.
OK, if the companies fielding the robot taxis pay for implementing those new systems entirely.
Since their products, which they profit from, make those systems necessary in the first place.
Then they can be remote-controlled by criminals to abduct people. That doesn’t seem wise.