Be careful with that one. I’m not sure about your experience level, but a mistake newer (and some more experienced) programmers often make is taking DRY too far.
It’s easy to “dry” something up to the point where it’s spaghetti that’s overly clever about how it reduces lines of code resulting in some crazy inheritance hierarchy even you (the author) are afraid to change a few years down the road.
There are of course other times when someone just copy and pasted e.g. sort logic all over the code base … but that sort of thing is relatively rare
To me, there is no greater high than seeing big negative numbers on a commit. Deleting stuff is the most satisfying experience in programming. A commit with +10, -142 is mint.
The biggest scam about programmers is they barely program
He’s got a point, though, the further you go, the less time you spend inputting code. Although some people prefer to continue going head first and then remaking everything.
like with many jobs you’re learning to only do the work that matters, and oftentimes when you can avoid doing work that actually improves the product.
There’s a reason why construction workers aren’t making their own planks and nails, that would be horribly time consuming, inefficient, and they’d probably make shitty planks.
That is a lot of fun to do, most times. Also I need to provide for my family and the guys who pay my salary want their stupid features implemented like yesterday.
Over the past month I feel like all I’ve been doing is writing tech design documents for systems I don’t actually know anything about because I haven’t had the opportunity to go in and do anything with them.
Fortunately I’ve finally managed to reach the point where everyone agrees that we should just start implementing the basics and see how that goes rather than try to plan it all out ahead of time since we’re surely going to have to throw out the later plans once we see what we’re actually dealing with.
Can ya please go back to the Drop-Down thingy for your license? It’s already annoying on its own, but it gets even more so when Voyager adds the Link-Preview
You know what’s funny, the two clients that don’t support your dropdown/spoiler for anti-commercial licences were commercial closed-source Lemmy clients.
That’s why I asked. Wasn’t sure if it was a joke about the name, or if it’s someone pretending to be Taylor Swift, or the real deal (which I never heard of because I don’t follow Taylor Swift - or because it’s not real.)
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
@ElCanut geee, I wonder how did they make Microsoft Access.
There’s an intern inside the server that checks every transaction by hand
Sometimes it feels like most of my job nowadays is deleting code now.
Be careful with that one. I’m not sure about your experience level, but a mistake newer (and some more experienced) programmers often make is taking DRY too far.
It’s easy to “dry” something up to the point where it’s spaghetti that’s overly clever about how it reduces lines of code resulting in some crazy inheritance hierarchy even you (the author) are afraid to change a few years down the road.
There are of course other times when someone just copy and pasted e.g. sort logic all over the code base … but that sort of thing is relatively rare
To me, there is no greater high than seeing big negative numbers on a commit. Deleting stuff is the most satisfying experience in programming. A commit with +10, -142 is mint.
It’s like the joke about the invoice charging 0.10$ for a screw and 100$ for knowing which screw to replace.
Coding is easy. Software engineering not so much.
I love SwiftOnSecurity.
LLMs will replace the programmers right before they replace the satarists.
Me, a programmer facing replacement by LLMs:
The best scene in a terrible movie.
Me: Spends 4 hours making a pause menu… “I wish this was true… This man has not met the hell of a 50 state, 100 elif statement…”
Amateur Coders code: " We don’t do this because its easy, we do this because we thought it would be easy"
We do what we can, because we must!
I’ve never found a problem that can’t be exacerbated with Microsoft Access.
Hmm, is this a new take on the “Stop Doing Math” meme?
Why don’t they program using spreadsheets? Are they stupid?
The job of a programmer is to reintroduce a bug that was fixed in the last patch.
Merge needs some stomp, yeah, mine stomp yours.
edit: note, this is a good thing, cause then we both have unlimited supply of tickets.
He’s got a point, though, the further you go, the less time you spend inputting code. Although some people prefer to continue going head first and then remaking everything.
like with many jobs you’re learning to only do the work that matters, and oftentimes when you can avoid doing work that actually improves the product.
There’s a reason why construction workers aren’t making their own planks and nails, that would be horribly time consuming, inefficient, and they’d probably make shitty planks.
Not trying to become an expert in everything was the most important decision I made so far, I think
That is a lot of fun to do, most times. Also I need to provide for my family and the guys who pay my salary want their stupid features implemented like yesterday.
I half agree about fun, think it depends on how often clients want some weird shit done yesterday, it becomes a nightmare if it happens too often :(
Over the past month I feel like all I’ve been doing is writing tech design documents for systems I don’t actually know anything about because I haven’t had the opportunity to go in and do anything with them.
Fortunately I’ve finally managed to reach the point where everyone agrees that we should just start implementing the basics and see how that goes rather than try to plan it all out ahead of time since we’re surely going to have to throw out the later plans once we see what we’re actually dealing with.
Absolutely. I barely touch code anymore, but I talk about how to touch code a lot.
https://www.smart-jokes.org/programmer-evolution.html
genuine c/programmerhumor
It’s like if farmers were just letting plants do all the work, instead of manually assembling the potatoes themselves
deleted by creator
Spoken like a true normie 👍
Anti Commercial-AI license
Hey, how do you get the creative Commons attribution to automatically appear under your comments?
Unfortuately, it’s manual :) Keyboard shortcut to put the text into the clipboard and then paste it into the comment.
If you're on linux using X11
Anti Commercial-AI license
Obviously your way works fine, but I think a browser extension could make it 100% automatic.
If you’re willing to make one, that’d be great 🙂
Anti Commercial-AI license
Can ya please go back to the Drop-Down thingy for your license? It’s already annoying on its own, but it gets even more so when Voyager adds the Link-Preview
please don’t, it literally fills half the screen for me
Dropdown doesn’t work for at least 2 clients. This is the best I can do.
If it really does bother you, block me 🤷
Anti Commercial-AI license
ok
You know what’s funny, the two clients that don’t support your dropdown/spoiler for anti-commercial licences were commercial closed-source Lemmy clients.
I say sod them and go back to your dropdown.
why would someone go out of their way to use closed source lemmy clients?
“She”. The gag of SwiftOnSecurity is it’s Taylor Swift, posting infosec. Tho these days she mostly trolls like this.
Is it actually Taylor Swift?
Yes. If you think that’s cool, just wait until you meet @MargotRobbie@lemm.ee
isn’t that the award winning actress?
I, for one, thinks she’s pretty cool.
Yes. On the matter security.
Of course, do you think people just go on the internet and tell lies?
That’s why I asked. Wasn’t sure if it was a joke about the name, or if it’s someone pretending to be Taylor Swift, or the real deal (which I never heard of because I don’t follow Taylor Swift - or because it’s not real.)