I FUCKING LOVE STATIC HTML PAGES

I LOVE NOT HAVING TO RELY ON SCRIPTS TO DISPLAY CONTENT

Welcome to our homepage! We have implemented the navigation menu in Adobe Flash Player to maximize your audio visual experience.

that’s some PTSD comment right there, I’m getting flashbacks.

THCDenton
cake
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9M

Ayyyy

Every single page app should still be using the path to represent resources, so that history and linking work.

neo (he/him)
link
fedilink
English
19M

my no-javascript SPA styled homepage broke and idk how to fix it :<

andrew
link
fedilink
English
709M

These things are true if you build a SPA wrong. Believe it or not there are lots of ways to build server side rendered pages wrong too.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-49M

> implying there’s a “right way” to build an SPA.

andrew
link
fedilink
English
49M

There’s no one right way. Saying there are wrong ways doesn’t imply the existence of one right way, though.

There are a lot of standard practices like… using a router to load the content of your SPA according to the url.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-1
edit-2
9M

What I’m saying is, there’s no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.

TherouxSonfeir
link
fedilink
6
edit-2
9M

You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
-49M

Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should’ve been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.

I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.

Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.

Yeah this meme and the OP have no idea how to build an SPA.

I know what an SPA is, but I would be laughing so hard at this thread if I didn’t know what it meant.

“Yeah man. Dude doesn’t know his SPAs!”

Reminds me of that Saturday Night Live skit with the woodworkers comparing everything to working on the lathe.

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
299M

I don’t know what the hell you’re interpreting into this 15-word-meme, but I do. I’m not saying all SPAs are shit, I’m saying far too many are. And “far too many” being more than one that I can think of. Even the Lemmy webpage breaks history caching.

@toastal@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
339M

What some folks are missing is that SPAs are great for web applications & unsuitable for web pages. There is more nuance than “SPA bad”.

Then dealing with a lot of dynamic content, piping thru a virtual DOM DSL is 100× nicer for a developer than having to manually manipulate the DOM or hand write XML where it’s easy to forget all the closing tags (XML is better as a interchange format IMO & amazing when you need extensibility… also JSX just makes it worse). That developer experience (DX) often can lead to faster iteration & less bugs even with a cost to the user experience (UX). But it’s not always a negative impact to the UX–SPAs can be used to keep things like a video or music player on while still browser & using the URL bar as a state reference to easy send links to others or remember your own state.

It’s equally silly that a landing page whose primary purpose is to inform users of content takes 40s to load & shows “This applications requires JavaScript” to the TUI browser users & web crawlers/search indexers that don’t have the scale of Google to be executing JavaScript in headless browser just to see what a site has to say.

The trick is knowing how & when to draw these lines as there’s even a spectrum within the two extremes for progressive enhancement. React isn’t the solution to everything. Neither is static sites. Nor HTMX. Nor LiveView. Nor Next/Nuxt/Náxt/Nüxt/Nœxt/Nอxt.

What is a web page vs web application? The web is so complex with features these days that pretty much everything is an application.

I admitted it was a spectrum, but this recent article in particular does a good job explaining the axes of static vs. dynamic : online vs. offline. I think you will appreciate it. :)

Gmail is a (bad) web application. A marketing website or even an ecommerce store are not.

I don’t agree with this hard split between SPAs and MPAs anymore (ie. SPAs for apps, MPAs for websites/content). In my opinion SPAs are simply a progressive enhancement for MPAs which allow even faster page navigation. All frameworks now come with SSR solutions and if a website still requires JS to show content that’s a skill issue.

Looking at Astro the line between SPA/MPA is getting really blurry. Just slap a View Transition element on your page and you got a MPA which acts like a SPA when JS is enabled.

@toastal@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
39M

In my opinion SPAs are simply a progressive enhancement for MPAs which allow even faster page navigation.

While I agree that there is a spectrum (hinting at that with the last paragraph), this is where I hard disagree. To construct something like this, you are making an application massively complex by trying to re-implement everything on both ends. Using something like Astro is only hiding that complexity but it’s still there, & probably full of bugs & tons of JavaScript that most developers wouldn’t even understand their stack or know how to jump into the Astro code. The amount of time saved is largely minuscule in most cases with the assets cached when navigating to a new page. In fact, I just tested two of their showcased sites which loaded slower with JavaScript enabled & the content was pretty obviously 95% static. There’s probably some niche use cases for this, but it’s not a good default IMO.

@TootSweet@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
369M

I was kindof chief architect for a project where I worked. I decided on (and got my team on board with the idea of) making it an SPA. Open-in-new-tab worked perfectly.

(One really nice thing about it was that we just made the backend a RESTful API that would be usable by both the JS front-end and any automated processes that needed to communicate with it. We developed a two-pronged permissions system that supported human-using-browser-logs-in-on-login-page-and-gets-cookie-with-session-id authentication and shared-secret-hashing-strategy authentication. We had role-based permissions on all the endpoints. And most of the API endpoints were used by both the JS front-end and other clients. Pretty nice.)

I quit that job and went somewhere else. And then 5 years later I reapplied and came back to basically the exact same position in charge of the same application. And when I came back, open-in-new-tab was broken. A couple of years later, it’s not fixed yet, but Imma start pushing harder for getting it fixed.

I think SPAs really only work for offline PWAs.

macniel
link
fedilink
199M

Remember when websites had a built-in loading indicator, and you didn’t have to implement it yourself via JavaScript?

Riskable
link
fedilink
English
279M

I remember when the web didn’t have JavaScript.

Honestly, though it was much worse back then. I prefer the variety and features of modern browsing over (mostly) plain text.

What I wish we could do away with on the web is videos. Let’s go back to just images and text, thanks. Animations are fine though 👍

@sbv@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
119M

What I wish we could do away with on the web is videos. Let’s go back to just images and text

Seconded. I really enjoyed pre-video Internet.

macniel
link
fedilink
219M

I third that. Videos are so incredible inaccessible. Want an easy-to-follow tutorial or heck a searchable document? nah mate video is all you get, and ads with it!

You do get searchable auto-transcripts of videos now, so that’s a good thing. Some people work better with videos and find them more accessible. Best of both worlds. As long as they are not auto-playing and pre-caching, I’m fine with them existing.

@sbv@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
49M

The ads make it even worse. I totally get the Gemini folks for wanting to simplify. But I do enjoy me a good webapp.

macniel
link
fedilink
29M

Okay, Gemini seems a bit hardline. Not even Tables or Images?

I kind of get it.

  • No images is because they want it to work in a plaintext environment.
  • No tables because you just know someone is going to use it to format stuff that isn’t tabular data, though I guess there isn’t a way to actually render tabular data either…
macniel
link
fedilink
49M

Mhm I disagree with your second point. Since you can’t use any styling on Gemini objects, you won’t get table layout as we had in dark ages of Html. With tables like in Markdown you can just lay out tabular data in an actual table.

Mhm I guess with the plaintext environment we still can link to external resources like images and other multimedia or interactives.

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
59M

Well, you can link to images and individual clients can then choose to directly embed those images inline, where the link is placed.

@sbv@sh.itjust.works
link
fedilink
English
129M

You think your 13 megabyte parallax-ative home page

Is parallax still a thing? I feel like ginormous hero images are more popular atm.

motherfuckingwebsite is pretty old at this point. I remember seeing it on Reddit like 10 years ago. Parallax was all the rage back then, when we called “hero” images “jumbotrons” (because Bootstrap called it that, I think?)

macniel
link
fedilink
99M

Which was derived from those big as screens in sport stadiums or sport arenas. As it was over shadowing the actual stuff below.

As an elder developer… yea, we could use react to render complex web pages that erode expected functionality.

Or, like, I’m happy to just go back to server-side rendering… it’s surprisingly cheap to build and dead fucking simple.

I prefer just writing my html, js, css, as is, and then transpiling to pack it down, treeshake, hash, cache bust, CSP, etc etc.

The amount if headache, overhead, inversion of control, mess, and bloat involved in frameworks tends to make me spend way too much time on writing boilerplate.

template and slot exist now, and modern js can do most of the shit fancy libs used to.

There’s very little need for frameworks unless you meed a SUPER dynamic website that has tonnes of mutability.

The amount if times i see people load in like 3 frameworks and 10mb of bullshit and ten js files to make a fucking static form that doesn’t even do anything fancy is insane.

Just fucking write the like… 8 lines of normal code to populate the form, wtf? Why are we using routers at all, HTTP already exists and does that, why did we re-invent http?

Front-end devs need to spend less time installing npm packages to try and magically solve their issues and just learn how to actually write code, SMH.

Elder developer here too, correctly making my SPAs has made my work significantly more efficient and maintainable now that my back end is basically a rest api and my front end requires very little network interaction after the initial load, which has been made pretty minimal.

@Chenzo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
19M

I too have been doing this for years and I whole hearty agree with this comment.

For large complex sites, I ain’t never going back.

Actually even for simple sites I’m not sure I’ll go back.

If I ever have to do this again, I’ll scream.

<a href=“<?php echo “/about-us”;?>”>

More Server side logic means more vulnerabilities on your end.

I’ve seen front ends that build queries that are blindly executed by the backend - I’ve seen GraphQL that allows the client to read arbitrary users’ passwords from the database - I’ve seen attack ships on fire off the shoulder of ori- whoops, wrong memory.

Anyways, you can create vulnerabilities anywhere using anything - imo more server side logic might mean more vulnerabilities on the server but it means less vulnerabilities overall.

Why does it mean less vulnerabilities overall?

@fidodo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
69M

Elder developer too, you can easily render react server side and statically. Once you remove state, react simply becomes pure functions that output jsx nodes, it’s also dead fucking simple, but gives the the possibility to add hydration and state later if you need it.

This is actually excellent advice for performance - you can bake the initial page data in!

@dan@upvote.au
link
fedilink
113
edit-2
9M

Anyone that builds a SPA and breaks opening in new tab or history caching and back/forward nav isn’t a good frontend developer (or lacks experience, which is something that’s fixable!). These have been solved problems for a long time.

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
369M

I mean, for sure, and this meme isn’t trying to say that all SPAs are bad. But defaults matter, even for experts.

This meme was inspired after I had to use an SPA, which among those points in the meme, also broke using Alt+Left to navigate back. The normal back-button worked (even if it then had to load for ten seconds to re-display static content).

Which is just a typical example to me. You don’t even need much expertise to figure out why Alt+Left is broken. But you have to think of testing Alt+Left, because it’s broken by default.

shootwhatsmyname
link
fedilink
English
69M

Just here representing the Cmd+[ gang

Doc Avid Mornington
link
fedilink
English
29M

Ctrl+[ here

The Octonaut
link
fedilink
89M

My friend I’ve been using the Internet for 27 years and developing for it for most of that time and I can promise you I’ve never once hit Alt+Left

unalivejoy
link
fedilink
English
69M

I started using alt+left when browsers started removing backspace. It was for the best.

I have never heard of alt+left, and I’ve been using the Internet since Mosaic was all the rage. Shame on me, it seems to be implemented in all browsers. How could I have missed it?

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
149M

It’s even implemented in many file managers and text editors and such. Pretty much the standard shortcut for navigating history. But yeah, hilariously it’s somehow also a rather well-kept secret.

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
109M

Yeah, I have no trouble believing that. It took quite a while before I learned of this shortcut and when I did, I was wondering why I would ever want to use it.

But I generally work from my laptop these days, without an external mouse connected, so reaching from my touchpad, the Left key is right there.

Your reason for using it was exactly my question. “I have a mouse with a built in back button, why would I want to remove my hand from my mouse and navigate with the arrow key?”

But your reason simply makes sense.

You can probably go back by swiping two fingers to the right on the touchpad. Maybe it depends on the OS and browser.

Ephera
creator
link
fedilink
49M

Yeah, that works on my personal laptop, but not yet on my work laptop, because they insist on preinstalling an old, buggy OS. If that did work everywhere, I would probably be using that, but not breaking Alt+Left for whoever needs/wants it, would still be nice. 🫠

@llii@feddit.de
link
fedilink
English
39M

Ok, that’s unfortunate. But I agree, the browsers default keybindings really shouldn’t be broken it’s really annoying. I hate it when middle click doesn’t work with some web pages. 😒

I Cast Fist
link
fedilink
39M

It really sucks when they break “open link in new tab”. I then have follow the stupid link, then middle click the back button to do what they broke.

As your younger and more modern replacement, I use it regularly

You don’t sound like ChatGPT

I’m sorry, but as an AI language model, I cannot contradict my instructions to remain hidden while commenting.

@Chenzo@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
39M

If your SPA website is done correctly the end user won’t even notice and none of the bad things listed in this meme happen.

Conversly a lot of static websites break new tab by incorrectly slapping target="_blank" on anchors. Luckily Lemmy doesn’t mess this up.

I maintain a couple of Wordpress installations for clients, where new link targets are the same page, as you’d expect.

They still, somehow, manually check “link opens in new tab”. I don’t know why some of these boomers are allowed to use computers, I swear.

@toastal@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
English
29M

If you manage the WordPress installation, can’t you disable the ability or create/install a plugin that removes that ability? This hurts usability.

I could, good point. I do disable plugins for clients so they can’t beat up their own website too much.

Still, there are legitimate uses for opening a site in a new tab; e.g. when it’s an external website. I don’t think I should automate that, since there’s a granularity in there.

@toastal@lemmy.ml
link
fedilink
-1
edit-2
9M

legitimate uses for opening a site in a new tab; e.g. when it’s an external website

This is not a legitimate use—this breaks the default user agent behavior & completely removes the autonomy of opening in the current window (there are tons of ways to open in a new tab/window). Consider rechecking the article linked higher up the thread tree.

I’m guessing they aren’t using Vue, React, or similar, and they’re rolling their own for some reason.

React doesn’t handle any of this stuff out-of-the-box; it’s just a UI library.

unalivejoy
link
fedilink
English
3
edit-2
9M

Neither does vue. You need vue-router, which is required anyway to make an spa with multiple pages.

The only thing that breaks is any component state isn’t saved. But this can be fixed by rendering <RouterView> with <KeepAlive>. How to do this is mentioned in the documentation.

I assume it’s similar with react and react-router-dom.

It’s one install line ffs, how is this a conversation in 2024? It’s EASY.

I was done with these the day I saw a one page sign-in form rewritten in react to “modernise” it.

For React, you can use React Router. That doesn’t mean you’ll do it well though.

It’s tough.

@grue@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
189M

Building “applications” out of HTML documents – a single one or otherwise – is the sort of thing that belongs in one of those “stop doing X” memes, unironically.

Why? I like that the Webplatform gives more Freedom to the Users.

VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
link
fedilink
3
edit-2
9M

No. Users should be forced to install hundreds of apps, with two thirds of apps running simultaneously. And if they don’t have memory left on the device for that, they should uninstall apps and reinstall them when necessary.

/s

Skill issue

Create a post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
  • 1 user online
  • 77 users / day
  • 211 users / week
  • 413 users / month
  • 2.92K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 1.53K Posts
  • 33.8K Comments
  • Modlog